fancyred wrote:
jraeyre wrote:
Fancy, I never said their were lies in the article, but nice try.

I said it was tripe and liberal political/constitutional opinion.

Jra


If the things in the article are true, then they aren't liberal political/constitutional opinion, now are they.  Either you consider what was said a lie by making it an extreme left liberal opinion or it is true.   You can't have it both ways.  
I'm not going to go through, item by item, this whole foolish article, but I will stop at the first piece of tripe I encounter.

Hate groups HATE this. Hate it with a passion. Why? Because it means you can’t teach religion in public schools. Creationism is a religious belief, and thanks to the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment, you cannot teach my son that cavemen rode dinosaurs to work!
This little screed is pure opinion and as such cannot be judged for truthfulness. It can however be judged for worth and there is nothing of worth in labeling fundamentalist Christian groups who believe in Creationism 'hate groups'.

I see more 'hate' in this sentence than most things fundamentalist Christian groups say when they talk about teaching Creationism in public schools.

BTW, since it is you I am responding to fancy and I am getting to know how your mind works, no, I do not believe Creationism should be taught in science classes, either in public or private schools. It is not science, it is religion and should therefore be kept out of science class.


The only reason some people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory. - Paul Fix