apmom wrote:
I am not convinced he was a child abuser. When the parents of said supposedly abused child allows that child to repeatedly go spend nights and weeks with an abuser, who is guilty? When the parents of said child accept million dollar settlements, where does their legal arguement stand?

Michael Jackson was mentally childlike. That was his nature. He never had a childhood and when he made the money, he was able to have and do all the things he missed. That doesn't make him a child abuser either. Many, many people who knew him up front and personal also say he was not a child abuser. So how well did you know him Stalag? How often were you invited to his home, on trips with him, to his Never Never Land?

He was not found guilty of any crime and there was absolutely NO evidence presented to prove he abused anyone. He is a grown man and if he wanted to have a porn magazine in his bathroom, who the hell are you to say he can't? If a child walks into his bathroom and he forgot he left that magazine there, how does that make him a child abuser? How many times have you left something laying around where a child might get ahold of it or see it?

You blind assed people are disgusting.

Thanks AP, you said what I feel but I couldn't seem to put it into words about Michael. 
  

Republicans, the party of
DO AS WE SAY, NOT AS WE DO