apmom wrote:
Fancy, Kerry didn't spend his whole time campaigning telling us every move he made during those 4 years so obviously he didn't serve. Don't cha get it yet? But bush, who's pay records can't even be found, whose CO didn't ever remember him reporting for duty, DID serve his time. Thats how it works. It is strange that the CO wouldn't remember the President's son reporting for duty on his base. Who'd a thunk?
I have already stipulated Senator Kerry served and served honorably.

But four months in VietNam was still a lousy focus for a campaign considering his anti-war activism after he came home.

As is typical for around here, you can't find a logical argument for what I have said so instead you make things up you can argue against ("he obviously didn't serve") and then try to change the subject from John Kerry to George Bush.


"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it." --Thomas Jefferson