When I edited I hadn't seen your response.  Apologies for that.

I do think it's offensive and I'm not upset that it was removed.  It should never have been there in the first place. 

If it wasn't from his official website then I don't care.  It's interesting though that the campaign asked that to be removed but doesn't have a problem with the insinuations the super pac ads make about Romney.

Asking me if English is my first language isn't the same as saying I'm not seeing you're libertarianism (gosh I hope that's a word because if it's not it really gives your question a lot of traction).  But the former is an attack on my intelligence, the latter an attack on your politics. 

The Golden Rule works for me.  Let's give it a shot.

Now excuse me while I vomit because I really hate kumbaya moments..... smiley: tongue  (totally kidding here in case my emote misses the mark)

I think "lady parts" in a political campaign is crude.   Am I personally offended?  Not really.  If I were an Obama supporter I might be a bit embarrassed.  And I'm not a prude at all.  I just think certain things are inappropriate in the public and political arena.  Talking about "lady parts" is one of them.


Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people. ~ Eleanor Roosevelt