When I edited I hadn't seen your response. Apologies for that.


S'okay. No harm.

I do think it's offensive and I'm not upset that it was removed. It should never have been there in the first place. If it wasn't from his official website then I don't care.


OK. Let's just stop there. I can understand that, even if I don't share that sensibility.

It's interesting though that the campaign asked that to be removed but doesn't have a problem with the insinuations the super pac ads make about Romney.


Not at all the same kind of thing, and Romney is exactly the same sinner. Welcome to mass media politics on the bridge to the 21st Century.

Asking me if English is my first language isn't the same as saying I'm not seeing you're libertarianism (gosh I hope that's a word because if it's not it really gives your question a lot of traction). But the former is an attack on my intelligence, the latter an attack on your politics.


Suggesting that english is not your first language is not an attack on your intelligence, nor was it even a personal attack. There are billions of really smart people for whom english is not their mother tongue, and who might find themselves cross wise with english idioms and usage.

He said, innocently.

The Golden Rule works for me. Let's give it a shot.


Alrightee then. I'm more than willing.

Now excuse me while I vomit because I really hate kumbaya moments..... (totally kidding here in case my emote misses the mark)


Kiss me, you fool!

I think "lady parts" in a political campaign is crude. Am I personally offended? Not really. If I were an Obama supporter I might be a bit embarrassed. And I'm not a prude at all. I just think certain things are inappropriate in the public and political arena. Talking about "lady parts" is one of them.


Unfortunately, discussing "lady parts" goes along with abortion regulation and birth control support, etc. so forth.

On to the next thing!