ERBetelgeuse wrote:
nessus2 wrote:
ERBetelgeuse wrote:
raouldangerfield wrote:

That is actually the post that decided it for me. Petty, vindictive and playing the latest blog game: he isn't really even black/he wouldn't have won if he weren't black. I suggest that you cite that verbatim to a black friend next time. See how impressed they are. I literally cannot imagine how such thoughts every percolate in anyone's head.

One point of accuracy, however, for which I award points. He doesn't resemble John Boehner. Because Boehner is unfailingly orange.
What made him more qualified than Hillary to win the nomination?  
He got more votes?
And the logical follow-up question -- why did he get more votes?  And that of course goes back to my original question as to what made him more qualified. 

  
The winner of most Presidential races doesn't win because he is more "qualified" than his opponent, but rather who articulates his plan or vision of the furture to the voters. I don't cast my vote because candidate A is more qualified than candidate B, I cast my vote by who sells a better future to me. As far as qualifications go, there are only 2 that any candidate must have, age and country of birth, the rest is hogwash or something the pundits decided candidates must posess.