"I cannot control what the leaders of Islam does ..." Rosey

Correct.
Thus the comment addressed them, not you.
I realize the futility of a parade of one.
I've tilted at a few windmills in my time too Rosey.
But my comments here are sincerely addressed to the ostensible peace loving Muslim majority, if there is one.
"Why would Al Jazeera report it when it would not support what the radical Islamic leaders want??" Rosey

a) Because it's news, and they're a news reporting organization.
b) Because even though Bush is in power, the news around here still reports about Democrat stuff sometimes.
c) The premise is that the violent radicals are a small minority; and that the vast majority; not just 50%+1, but perhaps 90% or more want Islam to be a peace loving religion and People. And if that, then why would Al Jazeera cater to a tiny minority, to the objection of the vast majority. Not likely. Not plausible.
"But not all countries will allow peaceful demonstrations....or any type of demonstration." Rosey

I'm referring to the ones where violent demonstrations take place.
Do you really mean to suggest violent, including deadly demonstrations can take place there, but sincere believers can't stand in silence, and demonstrate their superior solidarity for peace, and against violence?
Not plausible. Perhaps in Myanmar. But throughout Islam?
It's not just that it doesn't happen everyplace. It never seems to happen much of any place; as a proportion to the violent protests.

If the ratio of peace loving Muslims to violence loving Muslims is 90:10, then why wouldn't the ratio of the demonstrations for peace outnumber the demonstrations for violence by that same ratio?

When Medgar Evers was killed, the civil rights movement leaders didn't band together and say:
- Alright. They keelt one of us. So now let's go out there and keel us some of them! -

Instead, they stood in unity for civil rights.
And whereas while Islam has been to one degree or another soaked in human blood for centuries, the U.S. civil rights movement got it done in less than one human lifetime*.
"what dodge? I dodge nothing." Rosey

Well Rosey, the tail still wags the Islamic dog.
So one of two things is probably true.
Either there is a peace-loving majority in Islam that isn't very clever about getting their opposition to the violence publicized.
Or perhaps there isn't this great big silent peace-loving majority in Islam after all.
Take your pick.
"Why aren't devout Christians taking to the streets here to stop the violence perpetuated by the American government upon innocent citizens around the world?" Rosey

I don't know. I don't speak for them, as I'm an agnostic. But, based upon Ockham's razor, I'd guess they're simply not passionately opposed to it.
Bush's disapproval rating is or was ~60+%. But that means his approval rating is ~30+%. And that may about max. out the "devout Christian" segment of our society.
But as I came of age during the 1960's, I'm not unfamiliar with political rallies, and anti-War demonstrations, etc.
They don't seem to be as common anymore. Perhaps that's because we don't have military conscription, per se anymore.

* No disrespect to our fallen countrymen in the War between the States intended.

"when the bigots of this world have been privileged for as long as they have, to them equality feels like discrimination." shiftless2