gwhit715 wrote
Any science which leads to conclusions that are in contradiction of YOUR beliefs is not, by definition, junk science. I am amused by how the climate change deniers love to posit that these scientists are propounding "beliefs" ... when it is those same deniers who have to turn away from science to uphold their "doubts". So who, exactly, is operating on beliefs alone here?
Just as climate change believers who define scientific data that is in contradiction of their beliefs as "tobacco science".


"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it." --Thomas Jefferson