AZKC wrote:
whonew wrote:
AZKC wrote:
Pure silliness. This is just an ME's office that feels like it hasn't gotten the news coverage it wants.

Really? I don't think it would be silly to label a scumbag as this man's murderer at all.
What would be the point? 

I am pretty sure they can't try and punish him for the crime. Furthermore, I really don't like the precedence this sets. He was adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity for the attempted murder, it seems highly unlikely they can claim that because the victim died 33 years later he wasn't insane after all.

It is a media stunt and it is working perfectly. 


I'd have to agree with AZ on this.

Conservatism is a pale horse, and the riders should be called DEATH.