AZKC wrote:
whonew wrote:
What a wonderful day.

Screw you, Ohio. Recognize this!

It's good to know that the 14th amendment means something for Sean and I too.

I always said they could only rule one way and they did, based on the reasoning that I stated.

Good luck with that, Texas, and other hateful states. Hate lost. You lost. Love wins.

Now the fight to fully become a protected class begins.
Actually, the court did not decide this case using the 14th Amendment. It used the "right of marriage" rather than "equal protection under the law" to make this decision and stayed away from declaring homosexuals as a protected class.


I know they didn't declare us a protected class. That's what I fucking said.

But to claim that this decision wasn't based on the 14th amendment is nothing but bullshit.

I quote from Page 1:

Held: The Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State.