bacchys wrote:
whonew wrote:
Oh...we can have something "separate but equal," right?

How very, very big of you gentlemen.
What part of "I'm for expanding marriage..."  confuses you?

When the issue first came up, I thought civil unions were a reasonable compromise. After watching the case where a couple of women who'd gone to Vermont to enter a civil union and then moved to Virginia before separating, however, I changed on that.  At that point, expanding marriage seemed to me the only reasonable policy choice to support.




Sorry for my confusion.