sear wrote:
"a serious attempt to shore up the state's medical marijuana law, which has been around for nearly a decade without defining the 60-day supply patients are allowed to have on hand." Woodward

This seems a peculiar approach. It might actually promote crime; as I suspect the vast majority of marijuana supplies in the U.S. are from illegal sources.

Wouldn't it make vastly more sense, particularly for long-term patients, to modify the law so that the patient may have a one year supply onhand?
Why?
That way the patient, or the patient's grandchildren, or whatever, can grow the supply needed; and that supply can last until the next harvest.

Isn't that a rather obvious win / win approach here?

I think the most sense would be made by removing these tyrannical laws


Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice:And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as Elohim for Yahushua the Messiah's sake hath forgiven you. Ephesians 4:31-32